Pin Feed
The honest comparison

Pin Feed vs Ruttl

Ruttl hands your reviewers an editor. Pin Feed hands them a pushpin. Both pin comments on live websites; the difference is everything stacked on top.

Free for 3 projects · 14 days of Pro included · No credit card
Side by side

The short version

Both tools load the real site. Ruttl then adds an edit mode, bug tracking, and a wider product surface. Pin Feed stays on one job: get client feedback pinned, discussed, and resolved.

FeaturePin FeedRuttl
Built forClient review: pin, comment, resolveReview plus design edits, bug tracking, and more
Works on live websitesYesYes
Edit CSS on the pageNo, on purpose (see below)Yes
Clients review without an accountName + email on one share linkGuest commenting supported
Viewports with separate pin setsDesktop 1440, tablet 768, mobile 375Device preview
Auto screenshot at every pinPoint-in-time capture, works on iPhone SafariVaries
Image and PDF proofingYes, each version keeps its own pinsYes
IntegrationsSlack (Jira, Linear, Trello coming soon)A longer list today
PricingFlat: Free plan, Pro $49/mo, every feature on bothTiered, limits vary by plan

Checked June 2026. Ruttl ships changes too; if a row is out of date, tell us and we will fix it.

Weighing more than these two? We compared the whole field in the best Ruttl alternatives.

The real difference

Two different ideas of what a review is

Ruttl's headline feature is edit mode: reviewers change text, fonts, colors, and spacing on the live page, then hand the result to a developer. Pin Feed thinks reviewers should point, not edit. Here is why we built it that way.

Edits made in a review tool never ship

A CSS change inside someone else's proxy is not in your repo, your theme, or your build. A developer still re-implements it from scratch. The edit was a sketch wearing a code costume, so we skipped the costume.

An edit mode turns clients into co-designers

Hand a client a tool that moves buttons and swaps fonts and the review becomes a redesign. A pin keeps feedback scoped: here is the element, here is what is wrong, your team decides how to fix it.

Simple is what clients actually finish

Every mode, panel, and toolbar is one more place for a non-technical reviewer to get lost. Pin Feed gives them a crosshair and a comment box. Name, email, pin, done. Reviews finish faster because there is less tool to learn.

The ownable difference

Three viewports, three sets of pins

When your client says the site looks broken on her phone, she switches to the mobile view, pins the exact element, and that pin stays in the mobile set. Desktop 1440, tablet 768, and mobile 375 each keep their own feedback, with an unresolved count on every device icon. See the full story on multi-viewport review.

  • Tablet and mobile render inside realistic device frames
  • Each viewport's pin set stays separate, so mobile bugs stop hiding in desktop threads
  • Capture works on iPhone Safari, where most review tools give up
Desktop · 1440
Tablet · 768
Mobile · 375
Zero-friction clients

One link is the whole onboarding

No invite emails, no passwords, no “I couldn't log in” call on a Friday. You copy the share link, your client opens it, types a name and an email, and starts pinning. Every pin auto-captures a screenshot of the page at that moment, so the feedback keeps its context even after the site changes. That flow is the whole product; see client review for the rest.

  • Guests can view, pin, draw, comment, and resolve, no account ever
  • Six drawing tools with any hex color when a pin alone will not cut it
  • Rotate the share link any time to instantly cut off access
M
Maya2h
Can we tighten the H1 tracking? Feels loose at this size.
S
Sam1h
Done. Pushed to staging, refresh and tell me.
M
Maya5m
Way better. Resolving.
Resolved · 2 minutes ago
Fair is fair

Where Ruttl is the better pick

An honest comparison cuts both ways. Ruttl is a real product with real strengths, and for some teams it is the right call.

  • You want to mock up the fix, not describe it. If your reviewers are designers who think in CSS values and want to nudge spacing or swap a font live before briefing a developer, Ruttl's edit mode does exactly that and we do not.

  • You want one subscription for a wider surface. Ruttl stretches into bug tracking and other feedback workflows beyond website review. If you would rather consolidate tools than keep them focused, that breadth is a genuine plus.

  • You depend on an integration we have not shipped. Today Pin Feed connects to Slack, with Jira, Linear, and Trello coming soon. If one of those is load-bearing for your team right now, Ruttl's integration list is longer.

If review is the job and everything else is noise, keep reading. The easiest test is to run both on a live project this week: Pin Feed's free plan covers 3 projects and includes 14 days of Pro automatically.Or browse every Ruttl alternative

0 client accounts needed3 viewports6 drawing tools1 link

FAQ

Pin Feed vs Ruttl, answered

Yes, if what you want from Ruttl is website review. Pin Feed pins threaded comments on the real, live site across desktop, tablet, and mobile, and clients join from one share link with just a name and email. If you specifically want to edit CSS during review or run a wider feedback suite, Ruttl covers more ground.

Try the simpler one free

Paste a URL, send one link, watch the feedback land on the page instead of in your inbox. If Ruttl still fits your team better, no hard feelings.

Start free
Free for 3 projects · 14 days of Pro included · No credit card